Bug-report qualifier
Whether the described behaviour is real, and then either a scoped engineering story or the actual behaviour written up for the reply.
For the team
“Is this a bug, or working as built?” is a question support can’t settle alone, and the release notes and the test plan wait on the same reading of the same diff. Now the code gives the first answer, in the thread.
For support and QA
The wait today
Support is asked to adjudicate the product’s behaviour with a help-centre article and a hunch, and QA is asked to describe the risk in a release branch before anyone has read it end to end. Both answers are sitting in the diff, and the price of getting them is an interrupt somebody has to absorb.
They ask
Mention @PRCHD with the question you’d have saved for a colleague, and it reaches the agent exactly as typed. The agent reads the project’s checkout in Act mode, which changes nothing on disk, and the answer lands in the thread footed with the commit it was read from.
They run
Each is a prompt plus a posture that someone on the team writes once. After that, anyone in a private channel the operator enabled for runs starts it with one slash command, and the result comes back in the thread. These are examples for support and QA, not a catalog to install — PRCHD supplies the engine, and each team writes its own.
Whether the described behaviour is real, and then either a scoped engineering story or the actual behaviour written up for the reply.
User-facing changes in user language, taken from the merges actually in the branch.
A manual test plan for what the diff touched, and nothing it did not.
A walk through the running app with the browser tool, screenshot by screenshot, and a note on what looked wrong.
A fresh worktree with a failing test that reproduces the reported bug.
Scheduled and triggered
Put the same recipe on a cron line or behind a webhook URL and it starts on its own, so work that used to wait for someone to wake up or find time is already done when people arrive.
What changes
The first-line answer comes from the code, names its commit, and takes a minute.
Where it stops. The thread shows one “Working on it”, and that message becomes the answer when the run settles, so a long exploratory pass over twenty screens stays quiet until it’s done.
Other roles
@PRCHD is the export limit still 500 rows, and where is it enforced?
Product questions get answered from the code, without booking an engineer.
@PRCHD what’s changed on main since Friday, and what’s risky in it?
The status an engineering manager currently assembles by asking five people assembles itself.
@PRCHD how hard would it be to support a second currency?
Leadership gets ground truth directly, at 22:00, without pulling anyone off anything.
Where your code lives
Repositories, worktrees, prompts, transcripts, diffs, command output, attachments, environment values, and the event log stay on the computer you installed PRCHD on — the one that already has your code and your tools. The agent works there, so there is nothing to copy into a hosted environment and nothing uploaded to be indexed.
One small public service handles what a computer with no open port can’t do on its own: it enrolls your computer’s identity, forwards short push notifications, and holds webhook deliveries until your computer collects them. Each delivery is sealed to your computer’s public key the moment it arrives, so the service only ever holds ciphertext, and it is never in the path of your work.
Standing watch
One person installs it — an afternoon, not a migration. Everyone else asks from a Slack channel they’re already in, and nobody creates an account, installs an app, or pairs a phone.